George Orwell, “Politics and the English Language,” 1946
Still relevant. This link came from a discussion going on in Making Light. Being clear and concise may actually get your points across in an agreeable manner.
George Orwell, “Politics and the English Language,” 1946
Still relevant. This link came from a discussion going on in Making Light. Being clear and concise may actually get your points across in an agreeable manner.
Rolling Stone : Was the 2004 Election Stolen?
My main reasons for dismissing the whole ‘stolen election’ conspiracy are:
1) I have a hard time believing that the Republican Party could coordinate a national conspiracy like that and
2) that the Republican Operatives wouldn’t be boasting or bragging about it everywhere they went.
Then I realized:
Any election, of course, will have anomalies. America’s voting system is a messy patchwork of polling rules run mostly by county and city officials. ”We didn’t have one election for president in 2004,” says Robert Pastor, who directs the Center for Democracy and Election Management at American University. ”We didn’t have fifty elections. We actually had 13,000 elections run by 13,000 independent, quasi-sovereign counties and municipalities.”
and that it may not be a coordinated effort on the part of the National Republican Party but the grassroot efforts of a rabid, fanatical county and state officials that were all leaning in the same direction at the same time. (The author of the article goes for the national conspiracy theory)
And the sum of the parts is greater than the whole…
Oh yes, the sources for the article
In the next election, I hope that every polling station that exceeds the margin of error in the exit polling is challenged, rather than restating the exit polls to match the polling results. We have Freedomn of the Press for a reason, and this is one of the primary reasons; to ensure fair elections.
Network neutrality – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Re my previous posting
I see that Wikipedia has a more in-depth explanation of what ‘network neutrality’ is all about.
I trust that the arguments – pro and con – will use a common definition for their discussions. I hate debates where one side is for apples and the other is against oranges.
InternetWeek | News | Net Neutrality Finds Bipartisan Support
I’ve seen a few other comments on ‘net neutrality’ lately, but this article from Internetweek had a link to the telecom group against it, Handsofftheinternet. So I went to their page but it looks like it just got started because they say they are going to explain their side and then don’t.
Continue reading Net Neutrality Finds Bipartisan Support
Rights of the People: Individual Freedom and the Bill of Rights
An excellent article on the history and evolution of the the right of privacy in the United States. And it is from our Department of State! There are links to a whole set of articles on other Rights.
I think that the three references they start the article with neatly summarize why we think today that every indivuidual has the right to be free from governmental review of their activities and property without a court warrant.
The right of the people to be secure in their persons,
houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches
and seizures, shall not be violated…
— Fourth Amendment to the U.S. ConstitutionThe enumeration in the Constitution,
of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or
disparage others retained by the people.
— Ninth Amendment to the U.S. ConstitutionNo State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge
the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States;
nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty,
or property, without due process of law.
— Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
(I wonder how much longer they will leave this page online?)
Some books that are referenced
For further reading:
Ellen Alderman and Carolyn Kennedy, The Right to Privacy (New York: Knopf, 1995).
David H. Flaherty, Protecting Privacy in Surveillance Societies (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1989).
Richard F. Hixson, Privacy in a Public Society (New York: Oxford University Press, 1987).
Philippa Strum, Privacy: The Debate in the United States since 1945 (Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace, 1998).
Alan F. Westin, Privacy and Freedom (New York: Athenaeum, 1968).
Contra-Contraception – New York Times
So, it looks like there is another question for the candidates: ” Are you Pro -or Anti -contraception?”
One of the parts of this article I found disturbing is the anti-contraceptionists claim that sexual promiscuity leads to the objectification of women. Whereas, in their view, women are just supposed to be baby factories. And men are just married sperm donors. No objectification there.
We have evolved socially. Recreational sex is now an option. Procreational sex is now an option. There are personal choices to be made, so let us educate our youth about those choices, the joys and the dangers, and let them decide.
Don’t let the troglodytes hold you down.
Can these crashers save this party? – San Francisco magazine, May 2006.
A lot of interesting concepts in this bit, including MoveOn and cognitive linguistics. It will be interesting to see what the Rockridge Institute produces.
Since I don’t consider myself a Democrat, I will leave it up to the party faithful to coordinate and consolidate their message/platform.
Either way, I don’t expect to vote for or support anyone who has gotten into bed with Rupert Murdoch, which includes all Republicans.
And then there is the ultimate rub:
… the agenda. Progressive leaders, latte drinking and otherwise, have no trouble telling the world what they’re against but more difficulty describing what they’re for. Man or woman, black or white, they will readily discuss the need for bold new ideas, but the ideas themselves are in short supply.
The Republicans of the past didn’t have much trouble articulating what they were against, but they also had a list of what they were for. (I don’t think they’ve delivered on much, or any, of it at the federal level, but that’s another story.)
USATODAY.com – NSA has massive database of Americans’ phone calls
Why is this an important issue?
(Essay answer please)
CSIndy: American patriot (May 4, 2006) I thought this was a well done article in last weeks Independent.
Scott Ritter, former weapons inspector of non-existent weapons, comments on what he sees as a major problem, the ignorance in the American Public. I agree with his sentiments.
DR: You’ve said Americans aren’t against the war in Iraq because it’s wrong; you say they’re against it because we’re losing. Is it just that Americans don’t like getting their asses kicked?
SR: I’m saying Americans don’t know enough about anything to have a well-informed opinion; this is all superficial. At the end of the day, yeah, we don’t like to get our asses kicked. We have a lot of national pride that’s based around the notion that we can kick anybody’s ass — we’re the biggest, baddest boys on the block. And in Iraq, we’re not winning, so a lot of Americans have their ruffles up.
Someone at Drinking Liberally brought this to my attention. I will need to review more closely tomorrow but the phrase
We stand against all claims to a total — unquestionable or unquestioning — truth.
caught my eye.
I wonder if just having seen “Life of Brian” will have an impact?