Category Archives: Economics

Wage and salary disbursements

Wage and salary disbursements A576RC1 – FRED – St. Louis Fed.

Took me a while to find this. I was trying to find the total annual US payroll. I found it rather quickly a few years ago but now the payroll services are obfuscating the  search engines. Plus it appears that I was looking for payroll and should have been looking for disbursements.

But there it is, $6.54T a year.

In the course of my googlings I came across the Personal consumption expenditures for the US and they run $10.37T. Interesting discrepancy between wages and salary and spending.

 

Health Care Rationing

The “Rationing” Switcheroo – NYTimes.com.

I agree with Paul here. If the Medicare system determines what it will or will not pay for – the basic medical care coverage – there should be nothing to preclude a patient from using their own money to get advanced or alternative medical care.

The Declaration of Independence did not declare that we have the right to life, liberty, and the all expenses paid pursuit of happiness.

 

 

A discussion

I saw an interesting interview with Senator Rand Paul by Jon Stewart last night, three parts. They were actually exchanging coherent ideas.

You don’t have the right to pollute your neighbor’s air, and the air is much cleaner than it was 30 years ago. (Only some of it is the Clean Air Act?) Things are a balancing act.

There is a difference between stupidity and over-regulation.  Government has a role in regulation. Congress has a role in stupidity.

Corporations aren’t going to keep themselves clean; we the people need to have some oversight. That’s what Congress is for.

Do we work to monitor the stupidity in regulation or do we get rid of regulation altogether?

Rather than taking a sledgehammer to the government, let’s debate the extent that regulations should have. Let Congress do its job and rein in the Faceless Bureaucrats as needed. But it seems that congress doesn’t want to get involved with the details and they pass laws with vague wording that requires substantial interpretation. And if the interpretation is not politically correct, the politician has a fall back position.

I  thought Paul’s example of Hazmat teams needed to clean up milk spills was a bit of hyperbole, especially since he tied it to Oil Spill clean up. Did a civil servant really tie the animal fat oil in milk to petroleum? Or is someone out there making fun of the faceless bureaucracy? Or is our milk supply really hazardous?  (Where are those milk inspectors when you need them?)

US corporate profit performance

I was just thinking about Corporate Taxes, don’t ask me why.

US corporate profit performance.

I’ve heard that the USA has one of the highest corporate tax rates in the world, 35%. So I am looking at these 2008 figures and see that Corporate profits are $1,360.4 Billion and they paid $292.2 Billion. That works out to 21.5%, not 35%.  I see from the 2008 federal budget that Corporate tax revenues come to $314.9 Billion. I don’t know why these numbers don’t agree, maybe different fiscal calendars, but the latter is still only 23%, not 35%.

If we really had a 35% tax rate we would be collecting $476 Billion instead of the paltry sum we are currently collecting. That would help pay for a few more months in Afghanistan.

I see that the US  corporate tax rate is listed as between 0% and 35%, so we don’t actually have a flat one-rate-for-all-corporations tax.  I guess the fun is in starting with 35% and seeing how quickly you can get it to 0%. Why don’t they make a flat 25% tax with no deductions and stop playing games? I would like for them to revise the corporate tax code such that any compensation paid to an executive in excess of the US presidents salary would be counted toward corporate profits and not an operating expense.

 

I think I see a problem

Blog – House GOP Spending Cuts.

Our government is broke and House Republicans are working to rein in wasteful government spending. Below is an initial list of 148 programs that will be terminated saving our country $100 billion.

Republican Congressional Committed is posting a list of 148 programs that will save us $100 Billion. I am not particularly  familiar with any of these programs – I think I have heard of a couple –  but I did notice if 148 programs were going to save us $100B they  would need to average about $675Million per program. I didn’t see that sort of average in a quick scan of the list, so I actually added up the savings of the 148 programs and came up with $14.3B.- average of $97M each. Now if these congress critters can’t even sum up their selected list of savings, what can we expect when they go after the big numbers?  More lies and obfuscation? (They’re politicians, it’s a rhetorical question)

$14.3B isn’t even a spit in the wind of a $3.7T budget, $100B barely is.  Come on guys, go where the money is – DoD.

There Is Still No Such Thing As Socialsecuritymedicareandmedicaid – NYTimes.com

There Is Still No Such Thing As Socialsecuritymedicareandmedicaid – NYTimes.com.

Krugman reiterates to need to keep Social Security budget discussions separate from Medicare, Medicaid and the other ‘entitlements’. They are  very different flavors of programs.

What I see is the biggest problem with the healthcare programs is that we aren’t funding them with enough payroll tax. Why don’t we just bump up the Medicare payroll tax up to 10%-15% and  make all Americans part of Medicare? from pre-birth to post-death?

Alternatively, we can just eliminate all government health-care programs – with a corresponding cut in the DoD budget. That should get our deficit down to 0 and maybe even start paying off the debt.   Then we will have millions of elderly dying in the streets much sooner that expected and this will save Social Security as well.

Other Mandatory Spending

I have been wondering what the “Other Mandatory Programs” are. It shows up in the  federal budget under the “Mandatory Programs” section – its value somewhere between Social Security and Medicare. The 2012 budget allocates $598B for the other mandatory programs. But I googled for a while and found:

Other categories of mandatory spending:

Individually, each of these programs don’t amount to much, but combined they are very big (as this CBO presentation shows).

Who’s foreclosing in your neighborhood?

I saw this interesting link in the NY Times

http://bucks.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/12/30/how-to-find-foreclosures/?nl=your-money&emc=your-moneyema4

On my browser you have to click on “show search options” to get the drop-down menu. I wasn’t interested in finding a particular foreclosure property, just in getting an idea of the economic health of my neighborhood. We look good, but the surrounding communities have got some problems. It would be interesting to try looking a through a set of quarterly snapshots to see how the maps change over time.