If the Senate is so eager to change the rules of the Senate, why don’t they change it so that any life-term appointment requires a 2\/3 up\/down vote.<\/p>\n
When you get right down to it, I would prefer that the federal judges have a super-majority consensus for appointment rather than the support of whatever idealogues are in the majority at the moment. (Judges are the only ones that get life-time appointments, right?)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
If the Senate is so eager to change the rules of the Senate, why don’t they change it so that any life-term appointment requires a 2\/3 up\/down vote. When you get right down to it, I would prefer that the federal judges have a super-majority consensus for appointment rather than the support of whatever idealogues … Continue reading Changing Senate Rules<\/span>