What to Photograph

via Boing-Boing

The very idea that the police may come up to me and take away my camera, or otherwise impede my taking photos in a public place, fills me with concern and a sense of dread. Given the actions of Transit Police in NY to someone taking photos for an Amtrak Photo Contest and other recent police transgressions there is cause to worry. And it all comes down to a someone thinking that they are authorized to harass and harangue a citizen acting in a manner they think is inappropriate. What do they call them now? “Mall Cops?”

Anyway, I was wondering if anyone has developed a CompactFlash card that can transmit data to a nearby card/flash disk – using bluetooth or something similar – rather than storing the data on the CF card itself. (My camera uses a CF card for memory.) Thus if someone takes my camera (police or thief) the pictures I have been taking will be stored safely somewhere else.

I suppose if a travelling companion had a receiver card as well, we could have redundant backup storage.  Probably want to protect the transmission so I don’t recieve someone else’s photos in addition to mine or vice versa.

A quick google of ‘Compact Flash bluetooth’ indicates that there is something out there. Whether it does what I want needs to be seen.

Who does What?

Why do legislators keep getting tapped for running departments and agencies? Aside from the fact that the legislator was elected by their fellow citizens to represent them or their state in the legislature; the legislator doesn’t have executive or administrative skills by virtue of being a legislator. A legislator says “This is WHAT we want to happen.” An executive says “This is HOW we will make it happen.”

(This is what I perceive as the problem with the parliamentary system.)

Look at Daschle, in the legislature for umpteen years and doesn’t know how to track taxable income. Because he thinks WHAT and not HOW.

Why doesn’t the incoming Executive go after executives to run his departments – Governors, administrators, CEOs, people who think of HOW they can make something happen.  He’s got a few, I hope they do well.

One last thought, The President is not King, The President is not King. The People are King, The People are King.

Capital Gains

Capital Gains Tax.

I would like to see the Capital Gains Tax, as applied to stocks and bonds, modified a bit. Specifically, I would like to address investment profits derived from securities subject to regulation/control by the SEC.

If you invest in a stock/bond/security and later sell it for a profit you pay a tax on the difference between your purchase price and your selling price – your Capital Gain. In and of itself, that’s fine. But, if you are selling one stock in order to buy or invest in another stock, you pay the Capital Gain tax on your profit and only have the remainder to invest in the new stock. You haven’t taken the profits and used them in the non-security world and you have less to invest in a new security. I would like to remove the Capital Gains Tax on security sales where the proceeds are directly applied to the purchase of another security. You are only taxed on the proceeds you take out of the security marketplace.

I think this would encourage, indeed stimulate, investment in new potential industries and encourage people to move their investments around. I find it sometimes isn’t worth contemplating moving investment money around when you know you will be paying a 15% – 20% – 30% tax on the proceeds. So it sits, slowly not growing. I may take other money and invest it in the new industry I think will be growing but the older money stays where it is, stuck until it is needed. The newer industry doesn’t get the boost it might with more capital investment and then good things don’t happen.

To train or not to train…

I am looking at going to Montreal this summer and decided to see what it would take to train my way there.

Basically, it takes time.

I looked at two different route options: DEN to MTR via TOR or via ALB.

For your consideration.

Train Trip to Montreal via Toronto
DEP City City ARR Train Time Layover Time Trip Day
2010 DEN CHI 1550 19:40 5:50 DAY 1-2
2200 CHI BUF-depew 930 11:30 5:30 DAY 2-3
1456 BUF-depew TOR 1937 4:40 16:00 DAY 3
1135 TOR MTR 1704 5:30 DAY 4
Return
DEP City City ARR Train Time Layover Time Trip Day
1805 MTR TOR 2326 5:21 9:00 DAY 1
830 TOR BUF-depew 1325 5:05 10:30 DAY 2
2355 BUF-Depew CHI 945 9:50 4:15 DAY 2-3
1400 CHI DEN 715 17:15 DAY 3-4
Train Trip to Montreal Via Albany
DEP City City ARR Train Time Layover Time Trip Day
2010 DEN CHI 1550 19:40 5:50 DAY 1-2
2200 CHI ALB 1540 17:40 19:25 DAY 2-3
1105 ALB MTR 1910 8:05 DAY 4
Return
DEP City City ARR Train Time Layover Time Trip Day
930 MTR ALB 1740 8:10 1:35 DAY 1
1905 ALB CHI 945 14:40 4:15 DAY 1-2
1400 CHI DEN 715 17:15 DAY 2-3

No matter which way you go, you will need to overnight in either Toronto or Albany.

So the Optimal way to train it seems to be go via Toronto. That is a nice city to visit plus there are a number of TOR-MTR trains to choose from if you don’t want to catch the 1135. I I actually ignored some earlier trains so I could sleep in.

And Return via Albany, where the are minimal layover times and you can get back to Denver in three days.

We to the Rescue

Reading Krugman today, he raises some concerns about Us, the people, bailing out the banking system without getting an ownership stake in the banking system.

My response to this prospect is: so? If taxpayers are footing the bill
for rescuing the banks, why shouldn’t they get ownership, at least
until private buyers can be found? But the Obama administration appears
to be tying itself in knots to avoid this outcome.

There are two good approaches I have heard about in regard to the bailout.

One is to create a parallel banking system to the current one that will handle the ‘credit crunch’ everyone is worried about. Let the existing banking system fail and then sell the new banking system to investors to recoup the people’s investment (and maybe make a profit.)

The second addresses the mortgage morass. The People can look at and underwrite all outstanding mortgages (I would only do this for primary residences and not for investment properties.) Basically, we look the current mortgagee’s ability to pay on their mortgage. If they have a $750K mortgage and can only make payments on a $500K mortgage, we would step in and take over the $250K difference. In exchange, when the owner sells the house we would our $250K plus interest and 1/3 of the profit (if any). (I am assuming that the current owner may hold on to the property until the market rebounds and the house is once again worth more the $750K) This allows the mortgagee to keep a house at a price they can afford, maintains the mortgages underlying the mortgage bond market, hopefully stops the mounting pile of foreclosures, and steadies the financial foundations that are crumbling away.

The Prisoner Returns?

From Cable360.net
AMC Sets The Prisoner Free


How much more more confident can AMC get? CableFAX editorial director Seth Arenstein poses that question in his blog, as he remarks on the guts the network must have to be presenting the late Patrick McGoohan’s The Prisoner for free on its website. AMC’s own version of The Prisoner, starring Ian McKellen as Two and Jim Caviezel as Six, premieres later this year. Seth, writing about the recent passing of McGoohan, says “assuming AMC’s re-make of The Prisoner is nearly as good as its previous scripted forays (Mad Men and Breaking Bad have each grabbed Emmys in their first seasons), McGoohan-mania, or at least a resurgence of interest in McGoohan and The Prisoner, should become part of the culture.”

Electric Cars

This Article on Tesla Motors reminded me of a potential solution to the range problem with electric vehicles.

Slot Cars!

Start with the Interstates and put an inductance coil down the middle of a lane and let the car pick up electrical power from the road. This way it can reserve its on-board batteries for when it is off the grid, or off-road.

The road power can be delivered by roadside solar panels, wind power, or by the national grid as needed. With feedback between the car and the road, cars can be zipping along at 50 mps or better, with some sort of auto-piloting. 

Then expand to convert other US Routes and the rest of the country can slowly follow suit.

Slot cars, that the ticket.

Money, Money Money…

I don’t like where some economic advisers are wanting to take us.

Why don’t we, the people, take this TARP bailout money and start our own bank(s) to provide the short-term credit for corporate entities – this appears to be where the credit logjam is occurring – and let the current financial institutions die? This will provide the capital needed for the economy to run for the near-term and if the new bank(s) is set up right it may be able to address the long-term funding growing corporations need.

We might even be able to get into some consumer credit business as well, but why not leave that to the banks and credit unions that didn’t run themselves into the ground. Once all the current banks that have dug this economic sinkhole  have buried themselves, we can sell our young vibrant bank(s) to investors and recoup our investment.

We don’t need to nationalize the existing banks and get stuck with their toxic wastes. We can start anew and try to do it right.I’m not sure that this approach will help any for the mortgage market, but realistically, people with no income and with a $500K mortgage should default and give the house back to the bank that financed them.

As the commenters in the linked article note, don’t give any money to the folks who created the crisis. Don’t reward bad behaviour.

Further ado

2007 Mean Household income is $67,609
total of 116,783,000 households
aggregate US income in 2007 – $7,895,581,847,000 –
Let’s call it $7.9T – Total 2007 US income.

The Median Household income is $50,233 which means that 58 million households are making less than $50K and 58 Million households are making more than $50K. And the Mean, or Average, household income is $67K. Something doesn’t seem quite right here… But I didn’t start this to talk about income inequality.

A few days ago I mentioned that the 2007 health care expenditures in the US were $2.2 Trillion and the per capita cost of that comes to ~$7K per person. And I thought that was a doable cost to support. How can it be done?*

If we go to some sort of National HMO plan that covers the full range of health care that $2.2T covered, then we can drop about 20% of the costs right off the top to get rid of the administrative overhead and all those redundant file clerks at every office, leaving us with about $1.8T to manage. I think about $0.5T of the expenses is for Medicare but I want to roll the Medicare expenses into my plan so I will leave them there.

I like the way SSA does it, and Medicare, with the Employee paying 50% and the Employer paying 50%, so the Employees need to cover $0.9T to cover their part of the HMO insurance.  $0.9T/$7.9T = 11.4%.

The Employers get out of the health care management business altogether, saving themselves a lot of aggravation and expense,  and will end up with a presumably healthier, more productive workforce.

So along with the 6.2% FICA, and an additional 11.4% payroll tax to cover the medical  everyone will be paying a 17.6% payroll tax. But unlike FICA/SSA, the medical/HMO can be used immediately. Should be used immediately. If people started getting routine medical maintenance when they are young, and using neighborhood clinics instead of emergency rooms for minor ailments, the long-term medical costs would drop a bit right there.

A 17.6% payroll tax is a bit steep if you have to worry about other taxes on top of that, but that medical coverage could pay for itself overnight if you don’t have the coverage today. I would further propose to get rid of all the deductions and other bits that make tax season so much fun and give a straight single deductible of $50,233. You only pay income taxes on your income greater than the median family income. 

*Must remember to start with First Principles:

We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish

justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote

the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our

posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States

of America.


I think this comes under the promote general welfare principle, so we can proceed
.

The Thoughts and Luminations of Jack Heneghan