- That all People are created equal.
- That all People are endowed with certain unalienable Rights, Including Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
- That Governments are instituted among People, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.
- That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of the People, it is the Right of the People, it is the Duty of the People, to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government and to provide new Guards for their future security.
- That Prudence dictates that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes.
- That all experience has shown that People are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.
Category Archives: Liberating Thoughts
What is a liberal society today?
Good question. I am having a hard time getting an answer.
The Declaration of Independence, the Constitution of the United States of America, the Bill of Rights; these were all written by liberals. Yet, 225 years later, ‘liberal’ seems to have taken on a demonic connotation. Well, fuck that, I am an American and that makes me a liberal. The liberal paradigm seems to have shifted quite a bit since the Founding Fathers did their thing. And this is good, we must either evolve or die. Over the years we have seen a liberal society pursue manifest destiny, go after slavery, back down the robber barons, bust trusts, attempt to regulate security markets, provide for the social welfare of its elderly, provide minimal medical care for its citizens, and try to prevent the poisoning of the public. The American people have forgotten their roots and seem to be actively supporting the rollback of these liberal evolutionary steps. It is time to stop this.
Politics and the English Language, 1946
George Orwell, “Politics and the English Language,” 1946
Still relevant. This link came from a discussion going on in Making Light. Being clear and concise may actually get your points across in an agreeable manner.
Immigration
There’s been a fair bit in the news about immigration reform, and its attendant problems. I am the descendent of immigrants, legal as far as I know. My grandparents emigrated in the 1920’s to head for a land of opportunity. (Ireland was no great shakes at the time)
My first thoughts were, why not just open the borders? All someone would need is a passport or official documentation of the country they are coming from and they can enter the US. The US may even have agreements with its free-trade partners that Driver Licenses or national ID cards would be accepted in lieu of passport. Once the immigrant is in the States, they can get jobs and work per US Labor laws, i.e. they get at least minimum wage and they can report improper working conditions without fear of deportation. This may help to get rid of some sweat shops and some black-market employment practices. Additionally, they would have their FICA and income taxes withheld and fed into the governmental maws. They would even be eligible to collect SSA if they ever become citizens.
States could issue Driver licenses to these immigrants, probably with a code that identifies the country of origin, or at least non-US citizenship. The immigrants could get insurance, their families could enjoy public schools and take advantage of most things that citizens can.
Can these crashers save this party?
Can these crashers save this party? – San Francisco magazine, May 2006.
A lot of interesting concepts in this bit, including MoveOn and cognitive linguistics. It will be interesting to see what the Rockridge Institute produces.
Since I don’t consider myself a Democrat, I will leave it up to the party faithful to coordinate and consolidate their message/platform.
Either way, I don’t expect to vote for or support anyone who has gotten into bed with Rupert Murdoch, which includes all Republicans.
And then there is the ultimate rub:
… the agenda. Progressive leaders, latte drinking and otherwise, have no trouble telling the world what they’re against but more difficulty describing what they’re for. Man or woman, black or white, they will readily discuss the need for bold new ideas, but the ideas themselves are in short supply.
The Republicans of the past didn’t have much trouble articulating what they were against, but they also had a list of what they were for. (I don’t think they’ve delivered on much, or any, of it at the federal level, but that’s another story.)
Am I missing something?
Maybe I should be paying more attention to irrelevant people.
When did George W Bush become a liberal?
I’m confused.
The Euston Manifesto – Home
Someone at Drinking Liberally brought this to my attention. I will need to review more closely tomorrow but the phrase
We stand against all claims to a total — unquestionable or unquestioning — truth.
caught my eye.
I wonder if just having seen “Life of Brian” will have an impact?
Liberalism unbound: Shifting the center of gravity in American politics
Some more thoughts on liberalism.
What he said!
From Talking Points Memo via:
James Dobson: “If the nation’s politicians don’t fix this national disaster, then the oceans of gambling money with which Jack Abramoff tried to buy influence on Capitol Hill will only be the beginning of the corruption we’ll see. Some religious leaders want new ethics rules for Congress, but that’s only a band-aid fix. Politicians need to root out this infection. Gambling – all types of gambling – is driven by greed and subsists on greed. That makes it morally bankrupt from its very foundation. Gambling creates addicts, breeds crime and destroys families. We need courageous office holders who will begin the process of shutting down lotteries, casinos and other gambling outlets.”
I think he has a good basic theme here, let’s try that some other ways:
Continue reading What he said!
Gary Hart Interview
From a BuzzFlash Interview (via Sideshow) I found this quote from Gary Hart to be memorable:
… the reason you can’t mix religion and politics is, religion is about absolutes, right and wrong, good and evil. Politics is about compromise. If you cannot compromise on issues that are not central to a person’s faith – and that’s about 99% of the issues our country faces – then the country doesn’t work. The government doesn’t work.
I think I will have to check out the essay, God And Caesar in America: An Essay on Religion and Politics, that spawned the interview.
Yeah, without compromise, this country doesn’t work.