All posts by Jack

A note to my Congressman

April 6, 2025

Mr Crank;

I read with great trepidation that DOGE and the hackers are being unleashed on the IRS systems. I don’t know what a mere Representative can do in the face of such an onslaught from the Republican Administration, but please find the fortitude to keep them away from sensitive personal data. I can not see any reasonable reason for these parties to be rampaging through IRS data, much less the delicately-balanced systems that maintain our tax/revenue collections.

Ditto for SSA.

Jack Heneghan

A Note to Jeff Crank

March 23, 2025

Mr Crank;

I see that the Republican Administration has begun to close off public access to data that has been collected with public monies by public agencies. These include NOAA, CDC, and EPA.

These data have been used to establish historical trends and to project future trends, both by federal agencies and by interested members of the general public. All of this helps to promote the general welfare, as mandated by the founding fathers.

Even worse is the idea that these data are no longer going to be collected, thereby corrupting decades of public good, because some in the Republican Administration don’t want the data to tear down their belief system.

Please work to ensure that the data collected by our public agencies remains available to the public for future analysis and interpretation.

Jack Heneghan

Note to Jeff Crank

Another note to my representative, March 6, 2025:

———————–

Mr. Crank;

I notice, with interest, that the Republican Administration is looking to put up lot of Federal office space up for sale in the near future, all of this to save $400M+ in annual operational costs.

I think it would behoove Congress to pass a bill forbidding the Federal government from leasing back (or buying back for more money) any of the sold-off office space in the next 25 years, just to prevent the appearance of profiteering and corruption.

Jack Heneghan

Another response from Mr. Crank

Again, response to another missive I didn’t copy. I think this response came about 3 weeks later.

————————————————-

Another response from my Representative. He doesn’t seem to be opposing the Republican Regime. I notice that DOGE has been tasked to provide recommendations, but not to implement changes. This seems contrary to what I see being reported.

————————————————————————-

Jeff Crank

5th District, Colorado

Congress of the United States. House of Representatives. Washington, DC 20515

February 28, 2025

Hello Jack,

Thank you for contacting me regarding the review of federal spending and reorganization of the executive branch. I appreciate hearing from you and welcome the opportunity to respond.

As you may know, on his first day in office President Trump renamed the U.S. Digital Service as the U.S. Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) Service. DOGE is a temporary organization that will terminate on July 4, 2026—per the President’s order. The President has directed DOGE to provide recommendations on how to reduce federal spending, reorganize certain agencies, and improve interoperability between agencies. Changes to agency operations or policies must be approved and ordered by the head of each relevant agency or department, which is traditionally a Secretary appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate. Congressional approval is also required for some decisions.

I support President Trump’s efforts to reduce federal spending and eliminate fraud. The national debt is well over $36 trillion and increases by over $1.8 trillion every year. The Government Accountability Office estimates that the federal government loses over half a trillion dollars a year to fraud. The national debt has grown to the point where we now spend more simply paying off interest on the debt than we spend on national defense. This is unsustainable. Without serious course correction, essential government services like Social Security will become insolvent by 2033. There is no way to save these programs without serious cuts to federal spending.

Please know that I will keep your views in mind should legislation related to this topic come to the House floor for a vote.

Again, thank you for contacting me. If you would like more information, or to request help with a federal agency, please visit my website at crank.house.gov. There you can sign up for my newsletter or keep in touch with me through my social media.

Sincerely,

Jeff Crank Signature.

Jeff Crank

Member of Congress

Response from Mr Crank

This is from an earlier post I didn’t copy. I believe it was about why Congress is letting the Executive Branch cancel programs and monies that Congress has appropriated.

———————————————

Well, I got a response for my query about Congress holding the power of the purse. Seems to be a bit wishy-washy about doing anything in Congress, which is where it should be addressed.

__________________________________________

Jeff Crank

5th District, Colorado

Congress of the United States. House of Representatives. Washington, DC 20515

February 25, 2025

Hello Jack,

Thank you for contacting me regarding the budget. I appreciate hearing from you and welcome the opportunity to respond.

As you may know, Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution gives Congress the authority to create and appropriate a budget for the federal government. Over the years, excess and out of control spending by Congress has put our country into a staggering amount of debt. This bloated and unaccounted for spending has put our nation’s financial future into question.

The national debt is well over $36 trillion and increases by over $1.8 trillion every year. The Government Accountability Office estimates that the federal government loses over half a trillion dollars a year to fraud. The national debt has grown to the point where we now spend more simply paying off interest on the debt than we spend on national defense. This is unsustainable. Without serious course correction, essential government services like Social Security will become insolvent by 2033. There is no way to save these programs without serious cuts to federal spending.

I support President Trump’s efforts to reduce federal spending and eliminate fraud, waste, and abuse. Congress must find responsible and aggressive measures to balance our budget while staying true to our commitments to the American people.

Please know that I will keep your views in mind should any legislation related to this topic come to the House floor for a vote.

Again, thank you for contacting me. If you would like more information, or to request help with a federal agency, please visit my website at crank.house.gov. There you can sign up for my newsletter or keep in touch with me through my social media.

Sincerely,

Jeff Crank Signature.

Jeff Crank

Member of Congress

Letters to Mr. Crank

I have started to sent missives to my Representative in Congress, Jeff Crank. I missed copying the first few, not realizing that once they were sent they disappeared. I have since figured to copy them before I sent them so I could have a copy at hand.

February 21, 2025:

Mr. Crank,

Why is the Republican Administration firing IRS workers now, before Tax Day? It was hard enough to reach an IRS agent before this latest round of firings and layoffs to answer tax questions.

Jack Heneghan

Revisiting the Estate Tax

Today the median household net worth (mhnw) is about $192 K. The average, or mean, household net worth (ahnw) is about $1500 K.

I have been leery of a wealth tax, since most peoples “wealth” is dependent on what others “say” they will pay for a property, if it were for sale. It is unrealized gains. But, once you die, your gains can be realized. This is when the taxes should kick in.

Using the mhnw as a baseline, when you die your estate can distribute up to 100 times the mhnw tax-free. In our example above, the first $19.2 M is estate tax-free. From 100 mnhw to 1000 mnhw, your estate is taxed at 50% and beyond 1000 mnhw your estate is taxed at 90%.

So, someone leaving an estate of $10 M will not have any estate taxes. Someone with an estate of $29.2 will have $5 M in estate taxes, leaving the heirs $24.2 M to divvy up, And the heirs of an estate of one Billion Dollars will have a $813.6 M estate tax bill. They earned it!

GRAS

Generally Recognized As Safe (GRAS), is the FDA’s way of allowing an ever growing number of food additives into the US food supply without specific FDA testing. It allows the vendor/manufacturer to certify an additive is GRAS rather than proving it.

It would seem that the GRAS approach is reasonable, given the the ever growing number of additives and and the minimal risk of true harm. But, there are other countries that do take the time to evaluate some additives in their food systems and then determine those additives are not safe by whatever standards they are using. This would seem to me to remove the additive from the Generally Regarded As Safe category and should require the FDA to certify the safety of the additive independently of the vendor certification.

The FDA may very well find that the additive is SAFE by our standards and allow it to be in our food supply, but it should not be on the GRAS list.

Double Checking AI

Why can’t we run an AI check on AI output, asking it to evaluate the output for bias? It can review the output for racial, sexual, gender, socioeconomic, political, and any other number of potential biases, then put out a summary chart so you have overview of the inherent bias in the report.

You should be able to submit any article or post you are reading for this treatment.

Interesting, Word Press has added an AI Assistant to preview what you are about to publish. This is what it provided for this article.


The idea of using AI to evaluate the output for bias is intriguing. It could be helpful to:

1. Conduct thorough research on existing AI models for bias evaluation.

2. Collaborate with AI experts to develop a system that can detect and summarize potential biases.

3. Test the system extensively by submitting various articles and posts for evaluation.

4. Consider integrating the AI Assistant into the publishing process to provide users with a comprehensive overview.

5. Ensure transparency by clearly communicating the limitations and scope of bias evaluation to users.

The addition of an AI Assistant to preview content in WordPress is indeed an interesting development.

Partial Social Security Fix

The Social Security Trust Fund is running low and may not have enough income to to pay the expected outflow and it will then need to start reducing payments such that income and outflow balance. Sometime in the 2030’s is projected.

Currently an employee contributes 6.2% of income up to $160,200 (in 2023), with the employer matching that 6.2%. If they really can’t get rid of the cap on the employee’s side of the equation, why don’t they get rid of the cap on the employer’s side and let them continue to contribute 6.2% of income with no cap? That should put a bit more money into the trust fund.

Some Fast Facts & Figures About Social Security.