This Creeping Underwater Ice Tornado Kills Everything It Touches.
I agree with one of the comments that this really is not a tornado. Impressive nonetheless. I was not familiar with this phenomenon.
Comments Off
Archive for November, 2011This Creeping Underwater Ice Tornado Kills Everything It Touches. I agree with one of the comments that this really is not a tornado. Impressive nonetheless. I was not familiar with this phenomenon.
LG Optimus Hyper Facade in Berlin – Long Version – YouTube. One of the advantages of living in the big city…
EXCLUSIVE: photos of BofA’s new #OWS-themed ad campaign – Boing Boing. I especially like the “Building a better America, 1% at a time.”
I have gotten tired of all the nonsense hits I am getting on Google, so I am trying out another search engine -blekko. I made it my default Firefox search engine. It seems on Google that if you inquire about a subject then you must want to be buying it. No, if I ask about “bookbinding” I want to learn about “bookbinding” not buy “bookbinding”equipment or books.
I started thinking about this after hearing PJ O’Rourke on Marketplace. This was an essay answering the question about “If the 1% had less, would the 99% be better off?” We have a pie that represents the wealth of America. The “1%” controls about 38% of that wealth (2011). The “20%” (that includes the 1%) controls 88% of the nation’s wealth. If we use a net worth of $56T (2011) then 38% = $21.3T and 88% = $49.3T. Wealth is not zero-sum. In 2007 American wealth was over $65T and the control percentages were 1-2 percentage points lower. So while the overall net worth dropped 16% the top “20%” lost only -3% of their share of the pie (going from 85% to 88%). I wonder where the rest of the loss came from? Wealth is not zero-sum. But the pie is. It sums up to 100% whether the net worth is worth $65T or $56T. If the top “1%” keeps a lock on $20T and the net worth figures keep falling, their percentage of the pie keeps going up. and the “99%” keeps getting squeezed as their percentage goes down. It isn’t a matter of declaring wealth is evil or that reward for success is bad. It is a matter of saying that using wealth to promote a playing field that favors your increasing your wealth is bad. Buying the influence to set the field in your favor is bad. Gaming the system with a disregard for intent is bad. (Fraud is fraud, unless you can do enough semantic acrobatics to rob everyone blind, legally. I don’t disparage the 20% their wealth. No matter how you cut the pie, there will always be a 20%. But 88% of the wealth seems a bit much for 20% of the population.
First thing – DO NOT RE-ELECT any incumbents. It doesn’t matter if they are the best public servant you have ever had. Sweep the table clean and let a new mind-set in to office. And don’t vote for an incumbent until the system rights itself.
Second thing – get another political party going. Enough of these Republican/Mini-Republican electoral choices. A choice between the greater and the lesser evil isn’t much of a choice.
This looks like some useful information. That cornbread mix had been hiding in the cupboard too long.
There are a number of items I would like Congress to implement to start the economic justice pendulum heading back to sanity.
I believe this agenda falls under the mandate of the United States:
Nov
09
2011
QR | What is a Quick Response barcode & how to create or read onePosted by Jack in Geek Stuff, General, tags: Geek StuffQR | What is a Quick Response barcode & how to create or read one. Since I don’t have a smartphone, I haven’t really bothered with these 2D bar codes, but it looks like you can do a lot with them.
Beware the 12 Scams of Christmas | Smart Spending | Mainstreet. Looks like there are more scam opportunities for QR codes. There are some even more nefarious minds out there.
|